WG EVAL
Working Group: Evaluation
Coordinators
Emmanuele Russo (UNIBE, Chair), Hendrik Feldmann (IMK-KIT, Co-Chair)
Overview
The evaluation of the model results is the task of all those who apply or develop the model. Often, the biggest challenge is to find on one hand suitable observations (stations as well as gridded data) and, on the other, to define the measures fitting the needs of the evaluation in the best way.
The WG-EVAL brings together all the people who are interested in discussing datasets, evaluation methods, and results.
Tasks and Challenges
The need for more exchange and systematic comparison between different evaluation experiments was revealed as one crucial aspect to be discussed and organized within this COSMO-CLM WG.
This is based on the common interests:
- to better understand the model deficiencies
- to find out ways to overcome them
- to enhance communication of evaluation results (collecting and exchanging information about evaluation from various groups, for various regions)
- to define and introduce a standard evaluation tool (a simple rudimentary tool based on CDO or NCO utilities for a small set of common evaluation parameters)
Coordinated Evaluation Strategy
One main task of the WG is to develop a coordinated evaluation strategy for testing new model versions and newly introduced namelist parameters and to assess their influence on the climate change signal.
The process aims to provide a recommended and evaluated standard model version of COSMO-CLM.
The evaluation of cosmo5.0 is completed. The process was divided into 3 phases and is documented in 3 appropriate web entries :
🔑 Phase 1: testing of new parameters
🔑 Phase 2: testing of promising parameter combinations (started in Jan/2015)
🔑 Phase 3: tuning on the basis of CON607 following the Omar Bellbrat routine (2012), started in Jun/2015 at ETHZ.
The namelist settings are included under the entry 'CCLM-EU165_5.0_clm6' in the Namelist-Tool (list and start of the tool).
COPAT2 for COSMO6.0 and ICON-CLM is in preparation phase 0
🔑 Phase 0: set up of the models including model domain, time period, output variables, and their resolution.
🔑 Phase 1c: testing of new parameters of COSMO6.0
🔑 Phase 1i: testing of parameters of ICON-CLM
WG Meetings
WG meetings take place regularly at the COSMO User Seminar in Offenbach, Germany, in spring and at the CCLM General Assembly in Autumn. All community members are kindly invited to come to these meetings.
Date | Meeting and Location | Documents |
|---|---|---|
2021-09- | WG EVAL meeting CLM Assembly 2021, WEB session | 🔑 Minutes |
2021-03-16 | WG Eval meeting ICCARUS 2021 | 🔑 Minutes |
2020-09-15 | WG EVAL meeting CLM Assembly 2020, WEB session | 🔑 Minutes |
2020-03-18 | 🔑 Minutes | |
2019-09-19 | Joined PG ICON - WG EVAL meeting at CLM Assembly 2019, Paestum | 🔑 Minutes |
2018-03-01 | ICCARUS, Offenbach (D) | |
2016-03-10 | COSMO User Seminar 2016, Offenbach (D) | |
2015-10-01 | CLM General Assembly 2015, Belvaux (L) | |
2015-06-05 | web conference Coordinated Evaluation Project - COSMO5.0-CLM | |
2015-05-27 | workshop on the Coordinated Evaluation Project - COSMO5.0-CLM, Offenbach (D) | |
2015-03-05 | COSMO User Seminar 2015, Offenbach (D) | |
2015-01-20 | Coordinated Evaluation Project - COSMO5.0-CLM, Offenbach (D) | |
2014-09-03 | CLM General Assembly 2014, Frankfurt (D) | |
2014-03-20 | COSMO User Seminar 2014, Offenbach (D) | |
2013-09-29 |
Reports
Summary of evaluation results for COSMO-CLM version 4.8_clm13 (clm17): Comparison of three different configurations over Europe driven by ECMWF reanalysis data ERA40 for the period 1979-2000
Evaluation report for 4.8_clm17: evaluation_report_cclm_4.8_v8.pdf
(2012-03-21)
Evaluation Utilities
- Observation data -
Everybody needs reliable observation data to evaluate the model results. Carrying out simulations in different areas often opens up questions about available observational data sets for the specific region. We started to collect information on data sets. A list will be published soon but needs your input.
- Evaluation Tool -
ETOOL Version 2.0: Peter Berg developed a basic evaluation tool at KIT and provided it to the CLM-Community. Susanne Brienen and Andrew Ferrone extended it with more functions. The tool script is available here.
(2014-09-03)
Members
Bodo Ahrens, Ivonne Anders, Nico Becker, Omar Bellprat, Inge Bischoff-Gauss, Marcus Breil, Susanne Brienen, Erwan Brisson, Edoardo Bucchignani, Ernesto Caetano, Fabien Chatterjee, Evgenii Churiulin, Edouard Davin, Guy de Morsier, Matthias Demuzere, Andreas Dobler, Alessandro Dosio, Fallah Bijan, Hendrik Feldmann, Barbara Früh, Imoleayo Gbode, Beate Geyer, Matthias Gröger, Maike Hacker, Klaus Haslinger, Samuel Helsen, Anja Hermans, Klaus Keuler, Moritz Kirschner, Sven Kotlarski, Simon Krichak, Gregor Leckebusch, Hilke Lentink, Shuping Li, Patrick Ludwig, Xiao Luo, Mariano Mertens, Aditya Mishra, Qing Mu, Annika Obermann, Ouedra Ousmane Aly Yabyoure, Hans-Jürgen Panitz, Dirk Pavlik, Vladimir Platonov, Stefan Poll, Andreas Prein, Kai Radtke, Mohammad Rahimi, Burkhardt Rockel, Emmanuele Russo, Sajjad Saeed, Lucy Samvura Motsi ,Abdoulaye Sarr, Jan-Peter Schulz, Sonia Seneviratne, Christian Steger, Mauro Sulis, Wim Thiery, Heimo Truhetz, Nicole van Lipzig, Jesus Vergara Temprado, Fabian Wachsmann, Andreas Walter, Stefan Weiher, Andreas Will, Huan Zhang, Johann Züger
= CLM-Community login required